The Honda CB1100 had heritage to burn. So why did it fail miserably when they tried to bring it back in 2010?

The CB1100 can trace its family tree right back to the CB92 of 1959, taking in the ground-breaking CB750 Four of 1969 and many air-cooled, across the frame four-cylinder offerings that have come subsequently.

The new bike may have looked like it came from another time, but it was unfailingly Honda. And, on this occasion, that phrase was not a positive.

It wasn’t timing that saw the CB take off like a cast iron hang glider. A steel twin-cradle frame, old-school, large taillight, twin shock rear end, and, (Honda might have got a little carried away here) a double horn under the round headlight, all served to place it smack-bang at the heart of the neo-retro movement, which was taking hold big style at the time.

Honda CB1100
Handsome, reliable, but well, boring.

There’s no doubt that it was well-built, and the whole deal seemed to be aimed at making the bike as non-threatening and easy to use as possible, but the word ‘bland’ popped up more than once.

In fact, the words ‘stultifying boring’ might have smacked the nail on the noggin more squarely. The damned thing made you yawn before you’d even climbed on it.

Honda people must have shaken their heads in disbelief. ‘What should we do, build them with inherent problems?’, they must have thought to themselves.

You see, Honda’s immense reputation for build-quality is hugely deserved, but it has created a section of the motorcycling community that wouldn’t be seen dead on one. It’s unwarranted, but it’s there.

The bike was reminiscent of old cop steeds. Too reminiscent.

Well, the CB was not going to bring any of that odd brotherhood into the Big H’s market share graphs with any rush. It was utilitarian, simple as that. Like a mattock.

The engine was an 1140cc air-cooled, fuel-injected, 16-valve DOHC inline four cylinder, good for 65kW at 7500rpm and 92Nm at 5000rpm, coupled to a five-speed box with chain final drive.

There was a non-adjustable 41mm fork and a preload adjustable Showa twin shock rear end.

Stoppers were twin 296mm discs with Nissin four-spot calipers at the front, and a single 256mm disc with single-piston Nissin caliper at the stern. This setup was nicely up to the task, with stopping power very good and lovely lever feel and control. So, it wasn’t dynamics that caught the dear thing out.

Honda CB1100
Touring was limited by stupidly small tank capacity.

The seat height was very low at 775mm achieved by ‘sculpting’ of the rider’s section. Rounded to allow the thighs to be kept close to the bike, therefore giving better purchase for the shorter rider, there was little padding. Sore dates were talked about. Pain is excusable when thrills abound. Not here.

The seating position was decidedly snug for anyone of average height or above. It all seemed to be aimed at the rider stepping up from a smaller capacity. Honda thought that would change the word ‘bland’ to the term ‘user-friendly’. Cue fail-buzzer sound here.

There was very standard, clear analogue instrumentation and Honda’s much-acclaimed HISS system.

Lovely chrome sidecovers added a touch of bling, but nowhere near enough, and the bike was very much in proportion.

Build quality was typical Honda – brilliant.

It was quite a handsome motorcycle, and, importantly, for all its ‘ordinariness’, left you in no doubt it was a Honda from first glance. Again, that should have offered some drawing power in the showroom. Instead, it was crickets.

The bike delivered a very linear power delivery, gathering a decent turn of speed, but there was not a great deal from the bottom of the rev range. An engine map that made for a little more torque would probably have transformed the bike. Missed by that much. Yawn.

Handling was good, very stable and easy flicked from lean to lean. In the twistier going, the bike could be stirred along at a good pace, minimising fuss in that ‘oh-so-Honda’ manner.

Honda CB1100F
The CB1100F of 1983 was sexy and well loved. The newer bike failed to do its moniker justice however.

You could order a nice chrome rack for luggage, which complemented the whole deal while adding a degree of utility into the bargain. ‘Utility’. Not a sexy word.

For people given to understated looks, but with a handle on the theory of Honda class, there was a bit to like. It just came off a little like dancing with your sister; everything’s there, except the possibility of a pleasant surprise at the end of the night.

The CB1100 was very much in the ilk of seventies air-cooled bikes that built Honda’s deserved reputation for rock-solid build and superb reliability.

But the Aussie market can be a fickle beast. And, they reckoned the CB was an abject bucket o’ shite, and it was forgotten in sharp fashion.

Honda CB92
The first CB, the 92. Pretty huh?
Notify of

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
G. Wallace
G. Wallace
3 years ago

There’s no accounting for taste and that worked to my advantage when I picked up my new 2014 standard model for about half MSRP 3 years ago. I installed Arrow headers with a Staintune can shortly thereafter. The howl as the big air-cooled four approaches redline is intoxicating. She’s extremely comfortable on the road and will pull 6th gear from as low as 40 MPH. And that’s at less than 2,000 RPM where she’s already putting out 50 foot pounds of torque. I’ll sure never part willingly with her.

Geoff Marshall
Geoff Marshall
Reply to  G. Wallace
3 years ago

What do you mean “6th” gear? I really like the bike but it doesn’t carry enough fuel to be a useful bike in Australia.

C. Root
C. Root
Reply to  Geoff Marshall
3 years ago

The 2017 Model had a 6th gear and a considerably larger gas tank. Several other upgrades for 2017 as well. The bike never sold well in Canada because Honda wasn’t interested in promoting them and dealers couldn’t even get them for stock. I’m the fortunate owner of one of these gems and wouldn’t consider giving it up. Sure there are faster bikes (much faster 1100s) but this bike is so relaxed and effortless with torque everywhere and it’s fuel injection calibration is spot on.

Reply to  G. Wallace
2 years ago

we never received the updated 6 gear version in Australia – the bike had done its dash here by then.
From the get-go myself and some others in discussion reckoned “retro” didn’t have to mean ditching a gear for old time’s sake. That and too small a fuel capacity made it a too large boulevard/cafe cruiser.

2 years ago

I don’t get it. More bland than the other similar offerings from the other Jap manufacturers? Maybe a touch, but still deserved support.
Low sales? I smell a future classic……
darky out…